Contracts and agreements every service center operator needs

Last reviewed: August 2026 · Psychedelic law changes quickly — verify current status before relying on this page.

For founders and operators of licensed psilocybin service centers in Oregon and natural medicine healing centers in Colorado who want to understand what contracts and written agreements their business needs — with clients, facilitators, vendors, landlords, and other parties — and what each document should address.

The short answer

A licensed psilocybin service center operates within a regulatory framework that mandates certain written documents — OPS-required client intake forms, informed consent, and safety plans — and also requires a set of business contracts that OPS does not specify but that the operator must develop independently. The regulatory-mandated documents are published by OPS and must be used without modification. The business contracts — facilitator agreements, vendor contracts, the commercial lease, investor agreements — must be drafted specifically for the psychedelic services context, because generic templates will not account for the licensing requirements, federal law constraints, product supply chain structure, or liability considerations specific to this industry. This article sets out the full set of contracts a service center operator needs to have in place.

Regulatory-mandated documents — these are not negotiable

OPS publishes mandatory forms that every service center must use without modification. These are not contracts in the commercial sense — they are regulatory compliance documents — but they are written agreements that every service center must have in place for every client before an administration session occurs.

The 33-item informed consent document (OAR 333-333-5040) must be reviewed item by item with the client during the preparation session and signed before the administration session.

The client information form (OAR 333-333-5050) collects health history and screens for the three formal exclusions.

The safety and support plan (OAR 333-333-5080) is completed with the client before each administration session.

The transportation plan (OAR 333-333-5150) confirms the client’s post-session transportation arrangement.

The additional consent forms (OAR 333-333-5000(8)) cover each circumstance requiring separate written consent — supportive touch, group sessions, practicum observers, recording, data sharing, multiple facilitators, secondary doses.

None of these documents can be modified, substituted, or supplemented with operator-drafted language that alters their terms. A service center that uses its own version of these forms, or that adds provisions that conflict with the OPS templates, is not in compliance with OAR 333-333.

Facilitator agreements

A service center’s agreement with its facilitators is its most operationally significant business contract, and the one most likely to generate disputes in the absence of clear written terms. Whether the relationship is structured as employment or independent contractor, the agreement should address:

Scope of services and session types — which session types the facilitator is authorized to provide, and under what circumstances.

Licensing condition — confirmation that the facilitator holds a current OPS facilitator license as a condition of the engagement, with a requirement to notify the service center immediately if the license is suspended, revoked, or not renewed.

Dual licensure — if the facilitator holds both an OPS facilitator license and a professional license covered by HB 2387, the agreement should address how dual-licensed services will be provided, how records will be maintained, and which party is responsible for ensuring HB 2387 notification to OHA has been completed.

Compensation — how the facilitator is paid (per session, hourly, salary, or revenue share), when payment occurs, and how cancellations or no-shows are handled.

Records — confirmation that all client records belong to the service center and must be transferred to the service center within the OAR 333-333-4820 timeframes. The agreement should state explicitly that the facilitator has no right to retain copies of client records after the engagement ends.

Insurance — whether the facilitator carries their own professional liability and SAM coverage, or whether they are covered under the service center’s policy, and what coverage amounts are required.

Confidentiality — the facilitator’s obligations under ORS 475A.450 and any additional confidentiality obligations relating to the service center’s business information. The agreement should clarify that confidentiality obligations survive termination of the relationship.

Non-solicitation — if the service center wants to restrict the facilitator from soliciting clients they served at the center after the engagement ends, the restriction must be specifically drafted, reasonable in scope and duration, and consistent with ORS 475A.450’s restrictions on how client information can be used. See Non-compete, confidentiality, and employment agreements in the psychedelic industry for that analysis.

Termination — grounds for termination, notice requirements, and what happens to pending client sessions upon termination.

Client services agreement

In addition to the OPS-mandated intake forms, many service centers use a separate client services agreement that addresses the commercial terms of the client relationship — pricing, cancellation and refund policies, what is included in the service package, and disclaimers about the nature of psilocybin services. This document should be consistent with and not contradict the OPS informed consent framework. In particular, it cannot disclaim the service center’s obligations under ORS 475A or represent psilocybin services as having therapeutic or medical benefits that exceed what the evidence supports and what OPS rules permit.

A client services agreement that functions as both a commercial contract and a waiver and release is common in wellness businesses but requires careful drafting in the psilocybin context — see Waiver and release clauses: what they cover and what they don’t for the specific analysis.

Commercial lease

The commercial lease for the service center premises is one of the most significant contracts the operator will sign, and one that requires specific attention to the psychedelic services context. Key provisions a service center operator should negotiate or review carefully:

Permitted use — the lease must expressly permit psilocybin or natural medicine services at the premises. A lease with a general permitted use clause that does not expressly address psilocybin operations may be challenged by a landlord who later objects to the business.

Federal law compliance clauses — many commercial leases contain provisions requiring the tenant to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. A clause of this type, without carve-out language for state-licensed psilocybin operations, could be used by a landlord to argue that the tenancy violates the lease because psilocybin remains federally illegal. The operator’s counsel should negotiate language that addresses this risk explicitly.

Landlord consent to subletting and assignment — if the service center is acquired or an investor takes an ownership stake, lease assignment provisions matter. A lease that requires landlord consent to assignment and does not contain an anti-assignment-withholding provision gives the landlord significant leverage over the service center’s future transactions.

Term and options to renew — service centers that invest in build-out costs need lease terms long enough to recover those costs and options to renew that protect against displacement if the business performs well.

Improvement and build-out rights — service centers typically require specific interior configurations (administration rooms, monitoring arrangements, secure storage). The lease should address who pays for build-out, whether improvements revert to the landlord at lease end, and whether tenant improvement allowances are available.

Vendor and supply agreements

A service center must source all psilocybin products from OPS-licensed manufacturers whose products have been tested by OPS-licensed laboratories. The product supply relationship should be governed by a written vendor agreement addressing: the scope of products to be supplied; pricing and payment terms; delivery and chain of custody procedures; product testing documentation and certificates of analysis; warranty that products meet OPS specifications; and what happens if a product is recalled or fails testing.

A vendor agreement that does not require the manufacturer to provide certificates of analysis or that does not address recalled or non-compliant product creates liability exposure for the service center if a client is harmed by a defective product.

Service center policies and procedures

Written policies and procedures are not contracts in the commercial sense, but they are operational documents that function as internal agreements about how the service center operates. OPS requires service centers to have an emergency plan and a security plan as part of the licensing application. Beyond those mandatory plans, a service center should have written policies covering: facilitator conduct standards; client screening procedures; adverse event response protocols; records management; staff training requirements; and complaint and grievance procedures.

These written policies become evidence in any subsequent OPS compliance investigation or civil litigation about whether the service center operated consistent with industry standards.

Professional services agreements

A service center will engage outside professionals — attorneys, accountants, insurance brokers, consultants, marketing firms. Each engagement should be governed by a written agreement addressing scope of work, compensation, confidentiality, and ownership of work product. A marketing firm that creates the service center’s brand materials under a contract that does not address intellectual property ownership may retain rights to those materials — a problem that is straightforward to prevent at the contract stage and expensive to resolve afterward.

When public information may be enough

OPS’s mandatory forms are published at oregon.gov/psilocybin and are updated periodically — operators should confirm they are using current versions. OAR 333-333 provides the regulatory context for what the mandatory forms must address. Oregon’s commercial lease law is governed by ORS chapter 91; Colorado’s by Colorado’s Uniform Commercial Code and common law of contracts.

When you should speak with a lawyer

A service center operator should not execute a commercial lease, a facilitator agreement, or a vendor supply agreement without having those documents reviewed by an attorney familiar with both Oregon or Colorado’s psilocybin regulatory framework and the general commercial law principles applicable to each contract type. The OPS-mandated client forms do not require legal review — they are fixed by regulation — but the business contracts layered around them do. An operator who has already signed contracts with provisions that create problems should consult an attorney about what options exist to address them.

You might also want to read

• Non-compete, confidentiality, and employment agreements in the psychedelic industry
• Employment law basics for psychedelic service center operators
• Zoning, local opt-outs, and site selection for service centers
• Insurance for psychedelic businesses: what is available and what is not
• Investor agreements and capitalization for psychedelic businesses